<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ramblings, v.2 &#187; hussein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/tag/hussein/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mudman.us/ross</link>
	<description>v.2, even though this is my third (and a half) go at a blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Great Hyprocrite, round 2</title>
		<link>http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/117</link>
		<comments>http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/117#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rant-o-matic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mudman.us/ross/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I found this article, where the first paragraph saying (cause the rest is just fluff):
The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr. Obama, who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I found <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29whitehouse.html?_r=1">this article</a>, where the first paragraph saying (cause the rest is just fluff):</p>
<blockquote><p>The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr. Obama, who hates the cold, <strong>had cranked up the thermostat</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok, no biggie.  But then there&#8217;s <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h-wpxs1Re-8vx2Zk5xnYygW1W67w">this great article</a> (which is only great in the context of the above quote) where Obama was quoted:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong>We can&#8217;t</strong> drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and <strong>keep our homes on 72 degrees</strong> at all times [...]&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Riiiiiight.</p>
<p>Look, I get it that most politicians are hypocrites.  But this&#8230; Obama was supposed to bring &#8220;change&#8221; and &#8220;new ideas&#8221; to our government.  Instead, he&#8217;s bringing the same old idea of hypocrisy (&#8230;and socialism, but that&#8217;s not the purpose of this post).</p>
<p>In minor site news, I&#8217;m going to be keeping track of my hatred for our current president by both tagging all posts regarding him with &#8220;<a href="http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/tag/hypocrite">hypocrite</a>&#8221; and naming posts specifically about him &#8220;<a href="http://www.mudman.us/ross/?s=The+Great+Hypocrite">The Great Hypocrite</a>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/117/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A self ass-kicking may be on order</title>
		<link>http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/113</link>
		<comments>http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/113#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mindless prattling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mudman.us/ross/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to say it, but I think there&#8217;s a sick and twisted part of me that&#8217;s beginning to like Obama.
Go ahead and clean the poop out of your pants now&#8230;or rather not, as I don&#8217;t think this post is going to get any better.
A guy that I work with, a friend of mine, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it, but I think there&#8217;s a sick and twisted part of me that&#8217;s beginning to like Obama.</p>
<p>Go ahead and clean the poop out of your pants now&#8230;or rather not, as I don&#8217;t think this post is going to get any better.</p>
<p>A guy that I work with, a friend of mine, is what I&#8217;d call a &#8220;dirty, dirty liberal&#8221;.  Actually, he&#8217;s pretty clean cut, but that&#8217;s about the only work-safe adjective structure I can put in front of the word &#8220;liberal&#8221; in that context.  (And, if he&#8217;s reading this, he&#8217;s a real nice guy, and while I disagree with his political views almost entirely, he&#8217;s very well educated and I enjoy working with him.)  Anyway, he said that Obama is getting more flack from Pelosi and other super-leftists than the conservatives.  <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/pelosi_to_obama_repeal_bush_tax_cuts.php">Pelosi called for a repeal</a> of the Bush tax cuts immediately upon Obama&#8217;s swearing-in, and Obama has said &#8220;<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/18/obama-pelosi-odds-tax-cuts-mesh-possible-entitlement-cuts/">Now WAAAaaaaaAAAAAaaaaaAAAAAAaaaaAAAAAaaaAAAAaaiiiiittt a minute!</a>&#8221;  (Sorry, had a show with the band last night and have had Shout running through my head.)  Ok, cool.  Leave the tax cuts and piss off liberals.</p>
<p>Obama also picked a <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/rick-warren-to-give-invocation-at-obamas-inauguration/">pro-life</a>, <a href="http://icantbelieveitsnotademocracy.blogs.com/weblog/2008/12/obama-to-queers-thanks-for-all-the-money-you-can-leave-now-.html">Prop 8 supporter</a> to give the inauguration invocation.  Bitchin.</p>
<p>Obama <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/01/obama-sides-wit.html">supports</a> warrantless wiretapping.  While I don&#8217;t like the idea of being spied upon, if even <em>one</em> terrorist attack is foiled because the right people&#8217;s phones got tapped quicker than would have been possible if a warrant was required, so be it.  Big-brother the hell outta this country, as long as you keep my ass alive.</p>
<p>Finally, and the reason for this post, is a <a href="http://www.agrestic.org/?p=582">posting</a> at one of my friend&#8217;s blogs that Obama authorized a missile strike on two small villages in Pakistan suspected of housing terrorist cells.  So, wait, Obama, savior of tree-hugging, whitey-hating, peace-loving liberals said &#8220;kill!&#8221;?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not here trying to explain why I&#8217;ve decided to have his love-child [shiver].  I still think he&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.funnyandjokes.com/15-best-homer-simpson-quotes-ever.html/comment-page-1#comment-13391">lyingest lying liar who&#8217;s ever lied a lie</a> (2nd quote in comment).  And he&#8217;s a hypocrite.  After banging the anti-lobbyist drum for nearly his entire campaign, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090108/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/obama_defense">he appointed one anyway</a>.  Don&#8217;t forget that whole tax-cut/hike floating limit&#8230;first it was $250k, then $200k, then $150k &#8211; soon it&#8217;ll be $10k and we&#8217;ll all be screwed.</p>
<p>Saying &#8220;Obama&#8221; following &#8220;president&#8221; makes my stomach churn.  While he may be a dirty, dirty liberal, he&#8217;s pissing off other liberals. I won&#8217;t go as far as invoking &#8220;the enemy of my enemy is my friend&#8221;, but Mr. Obama is making me smile at an alarming rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mudman.us/ross/archives/113/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
